sábado, 10 de octubre de 2020

 

Flexibility in Education Planning

After a three-hour celebration for the student’s day, the thirty-six sweaty and overexcited students rushed into the classroom and refused to sit down. A chill ran down my spine when my practicum teacher crossed the threshold and sat at the back of classroom. Analysing the situation, I realised that I had to adjust my lesson plan.  I focused on the goals for the lesson revising food items and describing them, and decided to make a big circle on the waxed hardwood floor. The whole lesson took place there.  Using a soft and sweet tone of voice with some background music, we sang together and finally, a suitable atmosphere for the lesson was created. Hands were raised up with enthusiasm to participate in the description of food items. The student sang along, mimed, and danced the Apples and Bananas song. Students were deeply connected with the lesson until a man with a Spiderman disguise came into the classroom, carrying colourful bags full of sweets for students. He delivered them and Mrs Lloberas, my practicum teacher, gazed at me. Immediately, I asked the students, “What flavours do you have?” “Do you like them all?”. Then, we classified the sweets according to their characteristics and they voted the most and least delicious of them. The bell rang, my teacher approached me, patted me on my shoulder and told me “Excellent darling! You could survive after all”.

 

 From Theory to Practice

Outline of the article: Dolk, M., & Den Hertog, J. (2008). Narratives in teacher education. Interactive Learning Environments, 16 (3), 215 229.DOI:10.1080/10494820802113970

·         Purpose: To provide an overview of the research carried out in The Netherlands.

·         Thesis statement: Prospective teachers who write narratives in  a multimedia scenario are more likely to create a bridge between theoretical knowledge and practice.

·         Audience:  Teachers and student teachers.

1. Introduction

1.1 Dilemma between theory and practice

2.   MILE

2.1 Purpose of the MILE

2.2 Methodology of the MILE

3.  Narratives

3.1 Narratives in general

3.2 Narratives in education

4.  Method of research

4.1 Method description

4.2 Methodology cycle

5. Narrative knowledge

5.1 Stories in education

5.2 Verification of stories

5.3 Negotiation in stories

5.4 Separation between observation and interpretation

5.5 Stories to develop hypotheses

5.6 Meaning present in stories

5.7 Movement between levels of theoretical formality

5.8 Stories of a specific situation

5.8.1 Story sample and analysis

6.  Transition to construct a narrative

6.1 step 1: Observing

6.2 step 2: Sharing and discussing observations

6.3 step 3: Analysing

6.4 step 4: Reflecting

6.5 step 5: Developing narrative knowledg

6.6 step 6: Expanding personal repertoire and generalizing the situation into a  didactic for teacher education

7. Conclusion

8. Notes

9. Notes on contributors

10. References

 

Theory and Practice: Sealing the Gap

 

Dolk, M., & Den Hertog, J. (2008). Narratives in teacher education. Interactive Learning Environments, 16 (3), 215 229.DOI:10.1080/10494820802113970

            In this article Dolk and den Hertog (2008) present a six-step approach carried out in The Netherlands. The purpose of this approach is to help primary student teachers of math, in the development of a bridge between theory and practice, through the use of narratives in a multimedia interactive learning environment known as MILE. These narratives result from observing episodes, sharing ideas and discussing viewpoints. The next steps require analysing, reflecting and developing a narrative of the episode based on a critical understanting of it. According to the authors, the ultimate goal of the whole process is the personal construction of a didactic for teacher education. It is important to consider that the authors see this process as being cyclical and not linear. Although the research has been field-specific, the it  can provide any student teacher or college teacher with an interesting insight to see narratives as potential tools for encouraging self-reflection and the construction of meaningful interpretations of teaching scenarios.

viernes, 2 de octubre de 2020

 
                                                Below Standard Academic Writing

 Raković, M., Marzouk, Z., Chang, D.,& Winne, P.W. (2019). Towards knowledge transforming in writing argumentative essays from multiple sources: A methodological approach. Companion Proceedings 9th International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge (LAK19), AZ, USA.

 

In this article the writers examine the difficulties post-secondary students deal with when writing argumentative essays. The study of essay samples through computational tools reveals that when writing academically, the main issue relies on both the tendency to restate information borrowed from other sources, and the inability to analyse, synthesise and evaluate them properly, preventing writers from achieving knowledge-transformation in their productions. This article might provide an interesting insight for academic writers, since it emphasises the idea of metacognition as an essential prerequisite for creating meaningful interpretations of sources, rather than repeating what is stated in them.  However, it is mainly descriptive and it may seem to fall short to provide a practical guidance for the development of knowledge-transformation skills.

Below Standard Academic Writing

Outline of the article: Raković, M., Marzouk, Z., Chang, D.,& Winne, P. W. (2019). Towards knowledge transforming in writing argumentative essays from multiple sources: A methodological approach. Companion Proceedings 9th International conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge (LAK19), AZ, USA. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/333680138_Towards_knowledge_transforming_in_writing_argumentative_essays_from_multiple_sources_A_methodological_approach

 ·         Purpose: To present the research based on the analyses of argumentative essays for developing knowledge-transformation in academic writing.
 ·     Thesis statement: Knowledge-transforming writing is a complex process which requires higher-order thinking skills.
·          Audience: L2 writing academic students and teachers


    1. Abstract
    2. Introduction                        
           2.1 Argumentative Essays
           2.2 Rhetorical and content problem space
           2.3 Supportive arguments: Knowledge telling vs. Knowledge transformation
    3. Related work and theoretical model
           3.1 Cognitive and metacognitive operations to transform knowledge: Bloom’s taxonomy
    4. Method
           4.1 Framed research: Cases of study
           4.2 Coded sentences: Argument (A), evidence (E), counterargument (C), rebuttal (R) and not applicable (NA)
           4.3 Relational agreement among coders: Code processing results in essays 
   5. Conclusion:  Linguistic indices
           5.1 High accessibility markers and semantic overlap: Knowledge-telling
           5.2. Low accessibility markers and semantic overlap: Knowledge- transforming
   6. References
   7. Appendix

·